The impact of recent tariff changes on Australian SMEs
Once tariff responsibility is defined through Incoterms, the next challenge for Australian businesses is managing the commercial impact of tariff changes in destination markets. In recent years, the United States has become a clear example of how quickly trade conditions can shift, and how those shifts affect Australian exporters.
From April 2025, the US introduced a 10% baseline tariff on most imported goods1, including those originating from Australia. While US importers pay these tariffs at the point of entry, the commercial impact is often felt well beyond the importer alone.
For Australian SMEs shipping to the US, these changes have reshaped pricing conversations, delivery expectations, and margin planning almost overnight.
1. Tighter margins with limited lead time
US tariff measures have frequently been announced and implemented with short notice, leaving businesses little time to renegotiate contracts or adjust pricing strategies.
For Australian exporters, even a baseline tariff can materially increase landed costs for US buyers. In certain sectors, additional tariffs imposed under specific trade measures have pushed effective rates much higher, further straining already narrow margins.
A clear example can be seen in softwood timber, lumber, and selected wooden furniture products, which are subject to ad valorem tariffs when imported into the US2. Ad valorem tariffs are calculated as a percentage of the declared customs value of the goods, rather than as a fixed fee per unit.
This means that as product prices, freight charges, or insurance costs increase, the tariff payable rises in tandem. For Australian businesses exporting wood products or timber-based goods, these value-based tariffs can significantly amplify cost pressures, particularly where pricing has already been agreed with overseas buyers.
2. Indirect costs beyond the tariff itself
Tariff changes seldom operate in isolation. In markets like the United States, shifts in import duties have coincided with broader changes in global freight dynamics, adding indirect costs that can further squeeze exporters.
For example, in a report by FreightWaves, ocean carriers on key trade lanes between Asia and the US have been looking to implement higher rates while reducing the number of sailings to balance supply and demand on trans-Pacific routes3. This has resulted in fewer available vessels and upward pressure on freight levels for certain services.
For Australian SMEs exporting goods overseas, these higher or more volatile freight rates can increase overall landed costs, particularly on full-container shipments or when freight contracts roll over at higher rates. When combined with tariff obligations in the destination market, the cumulative cost effect can be significant.
Customs inspections and documentation checks triggered by tariff changes can also lead to longer clearance times, which in turn may result in:
- Additional storage and demurrage charges while goods await release
- Higher handling fees at ports of entry
- Inventory delays that impact cash flow and customer satisfaction
These indirect costs often go unnoticed until they appear on an invoice, which is why proactive planning around freight strategy, customs clearance, and tariff responsibility is critical for maintaining competitiveness in export markets.
3. The pricing dilemma for SMEs
Ultimately, Australian SMEs face a difficult decision. Either absorb higher landed costs and protect customer pricing, or pass those costs on and risk reduced demand.
This challenge is magnified for e-commerce and small exporters shipping lower-value consignments. Changes to low-value import thresholds in some markets mean that goods which previously cleared duty-free are now subject to tariffs, increasing the likelihood of unexpected charges at delivery.