China Plus X: The New Global Supply Chain
Uncover the full narrative and the strategic insights driving China Plus X
Get the white paper

To navigate the complexities of global manufacturing, Japanese businesses are now looking to China—specifically, at their China Plus One strategy—to mitigate risks associated with concentrating their entire supply chain solely within China. This typically involves establishing alternative manufacturing or sourcing capabilities in one additional country.
Unfortunately, ongoing geopolical instability and the shifting trade landscapes are now pushing businesses to re-evaluate China Plus One, hoping to bolster their supply chain resilience.
This article will delve into the inherent limitations of the China Plus One approach and explore the evolving "China Plus X" paradigm as a more robust and forward-thinking solution for supply chain diversification.
The China Plus One strategy represents a deliberate move by businesses to minimize their supply chain dependency by establishing alternative sourcing or manufacturing locations outside of China.
The core principle involves diversifying the countries from which companies procure parts, assemble goods, or manufacture their final products rather than relying solely on the China supply chain.
Initially, the China Plus One strategy was driven by a combination of factors. Companies aimed to achieve cost reductions by leveraging potentially lower labor costs in other Southeast Asian nations, mitigate risks associated with over-reliance on a single geographic area, and gain better market access to specific regions while still maintaining a significant operational footprint within the country itself.
The global landscape has undergone significant transformations in recent years, prompting businesses to seriously reconsider their extensive concentration of supply chain activities within China.
Reciprocal tariffs are duties imposed by one country in response to tariffs or other trade barriers enacted by another country. They are essentially a tit-for-tat measure aimed at creating a level playing field or pressuring the initiating country to remove its trade restrictions.
Retaliatory tariffs, on the other hand, are tariffs imposed by a country as punishment for specific trade actions or policies of another nation that are deemed unfair or harmful to its domestic economy. They are often more targeted and intended to inflict economic pain to compel a change in behavior.
Periods of heightened trade tensions and the imposition of significant tariffs on goods from key manufacturing regions have notably impacted global supply chains. For many Japanese businesses, this environment underscored the risks of over-concentration in sourcing and manufacturing.
Consequently, the uncertainty surrounding tariff landscapes and potential trade restrictions accelerated consideration and adoption of supply chain diversification strategies2, such as the China Plus One model. This strategic shift aims to mitigate exposure to regional disruptions and ensure more stable and resilient sourcing and shipping routes for Japan.
While China has long been a cornerstone of global manufacturing, relying heavily on a single country for your supply chain, even with a "Plus One" alternative, carries inherent risks that Japanese businesses must carefully consider.
Moving a step further from the limitations of a single alternative, the "China Plus X" paradigm offers a more comprehensive approach to supply chain diversification.
Recognizing the multifaceted risks associated with a concentrated chain, the need for true supply chain diversification has become paramount. The "China Plus X" strategy involves establishing sourcing, manufacturing, or assembly operations in multiple alternative locations – represented by "X" – rather than just one. This approach aims to spread risk across various geographies and build a far more resilient and adaptable supply chain for the future.
When considering a "China Plus X" strategy, Japanese businesses need to carefully evaluate several key determinants to make informed decisions about diversifying their supply chains. These factors will influence the suitability and long-term success of establishing operations in alternative locations.
Efficient transportation networks are a cornerstone of a resilient "Plus X" strategy. The availability and quality of ports, roads, and railways in potential alternative countries directly impact the ease and cost of moving goods and materials. Analyzing the infrastructure's capacity and connectivity is crucial for ensuring smooth logistics operations.
Transportation costs and transit times have a significant impact on overall supply chain efficiency. Higher transportation costs can erode the cost advantages of relocating production, while longer transit times can affect lead times and customer satisfaction. A thorough evaluation of these factors is essential when considering alternative "X" locations.
Understanding the various cost components in potential "Plus X" locations is vital for assessing the financial viability of supply chain diversification.
The overall infrastructure of a potential "Plus X" country will significantly impact the feasibility and efficiency of establishing and operating supply chain elements.
The caliber of the workforce in prospective "Plus X" countries stands as a pivotal element for enduring success.
Proficient workers and specialized technical skills will directly shape the quality of manufacturing and the operational efficiency of alternative sites. Evaluating the local talent pool and anticipating any requirements for training and upskilling is therefore essential.
Legal frameworks governing labor in potential "Plus X" nations can substantially influence business operations. Comprehending local employment statutes, employee rights, and social security obligations is key to ensuring regulatory compliance and effective cost management.
Ultimately, navigating the nuances of cultural differences and business etiquette between Japan and potential "Plus X" partners is crucial for fostering strong working relationships, facilitating clear communication, and ensuring seamless collaboration.
The regulatory environment of potential "Plus X" countries will significantly influence the ease of doing business and the overall risk associated with supply chain diversification.
Selecting the right multiple alternative countries for your "China Plus X" strategy requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors to ensure long-term resilience and operational efficiency.
Exploring potential regions, Southeast Asia offers a compelling mix of cost competitiveness and developing infrastructure. Countries like Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand have attracted significant manufacturing investment. South Asia, particularly India, presents a large potential market and a growing manufacturing sector. Mexico offers proximity to the North American market, while certain Eastern European nations provide access to the EU. Each region presents its own set of strengths and weaknesses in terms of cost, infrastructure, and regulatory environment.
The "China Plus X" strategy represents a significant evolution in supply chain diversification, moving beyond a singular alternative to build true resilience in a complex global landscape.
While China will likely remain a crucial part of many global supply chain strategies, the need to spread risk across multiple geographies is increasingly apparent.
Japanese businesses that proactively re-evaluate their supply chain management and explore diversified alternatives will be better positioned to navigate future uncertainties and achieve sustainable growth.
DHL Express understands the complexities of establishing and managing diversified international shipping operations in Japan. Speak to DHL's logistics experts today to leverage our global network, expertise in supply chain diversification, and comprehensive shipping solutions to implement your "China Plus X" strategy effectively.
1 - Yahoo Finance, 22 April 2025
2 - Japan Research Institute, 18 April 2025